Risk and control documentation
Manage linked risks, controls, objectives, owners, narratives, and testing criteria.
Connect risk and control documentation, process flows, fieldwork, testing, workpapers, review comments, issues, and status—then use AI for defined tasks your auditors can verify.
Control test · Interim
Journal entry approval
Approval evidence is dated before posting
Workbook · Sheet 1 · G14
Approver has delegated authority
Policy PDF · page 6
Exception receives documented follow-up
Sample 03 · follow-up draft
Lean teams feel every broken handoff because the same person often has to reconstruct the context.
Each step produces structured context for the next—so automation can act on the actual audit record.
Document risks, controls, and process flows.
Define scope, phases, owners, and testing readiness.
Collect evidence and keep samples organized.
Perform automated or manual testing with workpapers.
Review, resolve issues, and report operational status.
Every capability below is present in the current product; roadmap concepts are intentionally excluded.
Manage linked risks, controls, objectives, owners, narratives, and testing criteria.
Turn narratives or documents into editable flowcharts with linked controls and process-owner validation.
Use automated or manual testing in the same phase, evidence, workpaper, and review structure.
Inspect PDFs, spreadsheets, documents, presentations, images, CSV, and email evidence in context.
Assign review levels, discuss notes, return work, reopen it, and retain sign-off history.
Carry ineffective tests into owned remediation plans with severity, milestones, due dates, and validation.
AI can draft the process map, test the current attributes against evidence, place citations and annotations, and propose next steps. The auditor decides what is correct and complete.
Control test · Interim
Journal entry approval
Approval evidence is dated before posting
Workbook · Sheet 1 · G14
Approver has delegated authority
Policy PDF · page 6
Exception receives documented follow-up
Sample 03 · follow-up draft
An auditor imports the control population, generates a draft process flow from the walkthrough narrative, and links relevant controls. Evidence is requested and tested in the same workspace. Review notes point back to the source document, and an ineffective result creates an owned issue rather than a disconnected spreadsheet line.
An AI internal audit platform combines audit management records with AI that can perform bounded tasks such as drafting process maps, evaluating evidence, documenting tests, and proposing follow-up. Reviewable AI keeps source evidence and professional sign-off in the workflow.
No. IABuddy can draft test results, citations, annotations, and follow-up language, but the auditor reviews the evidence and owns the final conclusion.
Bring one control, one testing phase, or one evidence workflow. We’ll show you how it runs from plan to reviewed result.