Start from your RCM
Import controls and risks, preserve familiar fields, and establish versions and ownership.
Start with the RCM you have, define repeatable phases and sampling, connect evidence to testing, and leave a review trail your finance team and auditors can follow.
Control test · Interim
Journal entry approval
Approval evidence is dated before posting
Workbook · Sheet 1 · G14
Approver has delegated authority
Policy PDF · page 6
Exception receives documented follow-up
Sample 03 · follow-up draft
Lean teams feel every broken handoff because the same person often has to reconstruct the context.
Each step produces structured context for the next—so automation can act on the actual audit record.
Bring controls and risks from the existing RCM.
Refine controls, attributes, owners, and process flows.
Set fiscal-year phases, sampling, dates, and readiness.
Collect evidence and perform automated or manual testing.
Retain review, exceptions, remediation, and certification evidence.
Every capability below is present in the current product; roadmap concepts are intentionally excluded.
Import controls and risks, preserve familiar fields, and establish versions and ownership.
Draft missing narratives, attributes, PBC language, risks, and editable process flows.
Define phases, owners, dates, sampling rules, and readiness once.
Tie requests and sample files to the test that uses them.
Separate preparation and review, resolve comments, and retain sign-off history.
Connect failed results to follow-up, retest, remediation, and certification exceptions.
AI can help fill documentation gaps and complete first-pass testing, but it works against the organization’s actual controls and evidence and remains subject to review.
Control test · Interim
Journal entry approval
Approval evidence is dated before posting
Workbook · Sheet 1 · G14
Approver has delegated authority
Policy PDF · page 6
Exception receives documented follow-up
Sample 03 · follow-up draft
The Controller imports the current RCM, assigns owners, and uses AI suggestions to complete missing test attributes. The SOX lead defines Interim and Year-End sampling and creates PBC drafts. The team performs testing in IABuddy, routes it through review, and gives external auditors a clear chain from control design to evidence and remediation.
A company should consider SOX software when controls, evidence requests, testing, ownership, and remediation can no longer be governed reliably in shared files and email—often as IPO readiness introduces formal cycles, external-auditor scrutiny, and more contributors.
No. IABuddy can draft test results, citations, annotations, and follow-up language, but the auditor reviews the evidence and owns the final conclusion.
Continue exploring
Bring one control, one testing phase, or one evidence workflow. We’ll show you how it runs from plan to reviewed result.